“Ends of justice are higher than ends of mere law, although justice is to be administered through the law.”
~ Hon’ble Justice Krishna Iyer (Retd)
Rights and resentments must be self-proven and constitutionally assured; nonetheless, they aren’t enforced automatically. Over the years the upper courts of the country have returned to the mass call for enhanced security of women. Civic retribution of rape and sexual assault are long lived concepts in India. Stereotypical believes that a woman subsists as an affix to a man in her life; recurring claims of men over the bodies of women are well established notions of Indian society.
Varied crimes against women have reached epic proportions lately. The International Men and Gender Equality Survey, 20111 featuring gender attitude results depicted 68 per cent of the surveyed Indian men (n=810) admitted that women must tolerate violence for the sake of their families, while 65 per cent reckoned a woman deserves to be beaten at times; 37 per cent of surveyed men (n=929) had physically abused their intimate partner at least once; 24 per cent had committed an act of sexual violence against someone in society and 20 per cent had committed sexual violence against their partners. The most intriguing revelation from the TrustLaw research2 was that 92 per cent of those studied already had knowledge of the laws relating to crime against women. What does one conclude about the scenario of women in India?
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 became a landmark by expanding the definition of rape to include voyeurism, stalking, acid attacks in addition to vaginal penetration as punishable crimes. All dissenting penetrative sexual acts with person below 18 years of age will now constitute statutory rape. The character of the victim is rendered irrelevant to establishing her consent from the commencement of the 2013 amendment. However, marital rape is still kept from the purview of the Act. Further, rape and sexual assault were not removed from the bounds of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA). Also, Police will be penalised if they are failing to file the FIR.
Sexual assault cases in India
Every woman is entitled to bodily integrity. Sexual assault constitutes act of showcasing any kind of gesture, making intention or touching her against her will. Rape, one of the gloomiest offences against women
had widely increased and hiked in the yesteryears. Prior the 2013 criminal
amendments, according to the National Crime Records Bureau report of 20113, 24,206 rape cases were
reported in India, with significant increase in the molestation and rape of
underage girls. As per statistics, out of 1,704 rape cases registered in the
state in 2012, in 924 cases the victims were underage girls. According to 2012
statistics, New Delhi has the highest number of rape-reports among Indian
Whenever they stepped out of their homes, boarded public transport, or walked on the streets, or they risked, and in fact continue to risk, being groped, harassed and subjected to de trop sexual advances. Nevertheless, rather than their harassers being earmarked, their right to dress as they please, their freedom of movement, and their right very to associate with persons of their choice is questioned, curtailed and debated. While raising the slogan of justice for victims of gang rape/other rape and sexual assault with severe punishment of the perpetrators in India, the protesters brought out the dismal state of law enforcement in our nation. The exigency for accountability of the cops underscored the fact that they had not put into effect the law and were guilty of dereliction of duty in matters of sexual assault and rape, while the state had taken very scanty steps towards the security and safety of women in their homeland. The protesters had raised the issue of delay of justice on part of the judiciary, by demanding speedy trial and fast-track courts. Voices were raised for more stringent and explicit Indian laws contra rape and sexual assault. Initially started by the collision of women’s organizations and groups, particularly of the Left, these protests and demonstrations were widely held to have been led forward with populous support by the youth of the nation.
The verdict of Delhi High court in the Farooqui rape case4 has brought back locus onto the amendments made to Indian rape laws in 2013. Points about the necessity of the law for inclusion of sexual acts other than penile-vaginal penetration within the definition of rape, the meaning of free consent and the sentencing regime had been raised.
Before the amendments of 2013, the Indian Penal Code (IPC) described rape as sexual intercourse by a man with a woman without her consent. In five other circumstances, sexual intercourse amounted to rape, including that when consent was obtained through threat or deception. Maximum matters fell within the first part of the section i.e. sexual intercourse without consent. IPC had no definition for “Sexual intercourse”, while it only stated that penetration was enough to constitute “sexual intercourse”.
Nirbahaya Case / Delhi Gang Rape Case, 2012
Only after the death of 23-year-old physiotherapy student, who was barbarically attacked and raped by a gang of six men in Delhi that nationwide protests fuelled with demand of strict punishment for the culprits.
Protests were followed by national debate about women’s rights and safety in the country and persuaded the Government to enact stricter anti-rape legislation, inspiring a massive outrage across the nation. In April 2013 the Indian Parliament brought various amendments to the Indian Penal Code making some changes in rape laws in India.
Crimes of the nature of rape are usually associated with a lot of social stigma. Section 228A of the Indian Penal Code prohibits any person (especially the media) to “print or publish” the real name or identity of the victim in rape cases. The accused may be imprisoned for two years, along with being liable for a fine. The section aims at preventing the social victimization of the victim which is also part of the 2013 amendment.
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 that came into force on the 3rd of April, 2013 amended and included new sections in the IPC relating to various sexual offences. The new Act has expressly identified certain acts like stalking, acid attack, physical harassment and voyeurism as offences which were dealt under related laws.
· As stated under section 166A5, anyone being a public servant and knowingly disregards any direction of the law or disobeys any other direction to run proceedings shall be penalised with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months and can extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine
· Section 326A6 deals with the deliberately causing grievous hurt by the use of any acid, will be punishable with imprisonment of either for a term which shall not be less than ten years and can extend to imprisonment for life, and with fine.
· Sexual Harassment as under Section 354A7 is bullying or coercion of a sexual nature, or the unwelcome of inappropriate promise of rewards in return for sexual favors. The crucial factor is the unwelcome of the behavior, thereby making the impact of such actions on the recipient more relevant than the intent of the wrongdoer.
The essentials of the offence of sexual harassment as defined in the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan8 are –
1. physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures; or
demand for sexual favours; or
sexually coloured remarks; or
showing pornography; or
other unwanted physical, verbal or non-verbal sexual act.
Sexual harassment violates not only the article 14 of the Indian constitution which entitles right to equality but also the article 21 that grants everyone, whether man or women to live with dignity.
Prevailing Provisions and its amendment thereof
Before enforcement of this Act, the provisions in the IPC that dealt with sexual harassment existed but there was no clarity regarding punishment for the offence of sexual harassment.
· Section 354B – Assault or Use of Criminal Force to woman with intent to disrobe
8 Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. AIR 1997 SC 3011